Workshop [LAW] - Report
Tweets by @AIMEproject published just after the workshop:
LAW is difficult to extract from its institution contrary to other modes. As Condé noted it is part of its specs to BE its institution.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 29 Avril 2014Luhmann had seen in LAW its tautology & reflexivity but, as noted by McGee, he could not capture its openness and made it a distinct sphere.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 29 Avril 2014McGee's point is that Luhnmann starts with spheres which are all the same -communication- and thus have to be as distinct as geography maps.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 29 Avril 2014While AIME modes are different enough so that, contrary to Luhmann's spheres, they can all be present at once in any multimodal situation.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 29 Avril 2014Find below the titles/authors/links to online contributions as a result of the call for contribution :
When nuclear weapons make law's felicity conditions indiscernible [POL·LAW] by Pierre-Yves Condé http://www.modesofexistence.org/ime/en/cont/14592
The visual culture of [LAW] by Gustav Kalm http://www.modesofexistence.org/ime/en/cont/13915
Culture as a normative process. The meaning making of the law. voices from the bottom by Flora di Donato http://www.modesofexistence.org/ime/en/cont15063